Solution
In a first step we analyzed the particles sizes and distribution. Therefore, we took real samples from the production site, provided by the customer. We then used a sifting process to characterize the different particle classes. The sifting procedure was used to separate the sample into classes of different sizes, shapes and to estimate the quantity distribution as all these features influence the flow resistance and have a massive impact on the extraction rate. The structure of pulp fibers leads to a variety of different dust particles. The particle distribution is later used in the flow analysis.
The next step was the flow simulation of the airflow in the suction area. The complex geometry of the 8m wide cutting section was simplified and a numerical mesh was created to solve the flow field via a finite volume approach.
To calculate the suction rate a particle simulation was done. We used a Discrete particle model (DPM) in one way coupling method. The particle classes defined by the analysis before were injected in the flow field. The flow path of the particles is calculated by solving their equations of motion. According to the particle size and form each class of them has a different flow resistance which defines the trajectories in the frozen flow field. Flow conditions and the particle trajectory can change depending on the velocity, mass, and defined resistance of the particle. We solved the problem by repositioning the suction pipe in the suction area and geometry changes of the pipe to get an improved suction behavior.
Various detail simulations, 2D and 3D, were used to study the relevant parameters and to solve the problem. For small particle classes an increase of 50% suction rate was achieved. Furthermore, it became clear that large particles needed a completely different form of extraction method. Different possibilities are still under investigation.